首页--文学论文

印第安书写中的生态社会危机与混杂身份建构—后殖民生态批评视角解读《卑劣灵魂》

Acknowledgements第3-6页
Abstract第6-7页
摘要第8-10页
Chapter 1 Introduction第10-13页
    1.1 Research background第10-11页
    1.2 Research objectives and research questions第11页
    1.3 Methodology of the study第11-12页
    1.4 Organization of the thesis第12-13页
Chapter 2 Literature Review第13-19页
    2.1 Previous studies of contemporary Native American literature第13-15页
    2.2 Previous studies of Linda Hogan’s works第15-16页
    2.3 Previous studies of Mean Spirit第16-18页
    2.4 Summary第18-19页
Chapter 3 Theoretical Foundation第19-26页
    3.1 A brief introduction to ecocriticism第19-21页
        3.1.1 Definition and characteristics第19-20页
        3.1.2 Four waves of ecocriticism第20-21页
    3.2 A brief introduction to postcolonial ecocriticism第21-24页
        3.2.1 Development of postcolonial ecocriticism第21-23页
        3.2.2 Major assumptions of postcolonial ecocriticism第23-24页
    3.3 A brief introduction to hybrid identity in postcolonial theory第24-25页
    3.4 Summary第25-26页
Chapter 4 Mean Spirit: Ecological/Social Crisis第26-41页
    4.1 Speciesism and ecological crisis第26-32页
        4.1.1 Land policy第26-28页
        4.1.2 Petroleum exploitation第28-30页
        4.1.3 Animal Slaughter第30-32页
    4.2 Racism and social crisis第32-40页
        4.2.1 Physical persecution第32-35页
        4.2.2 Cultural assimilation第35-38页
        4.2.3 Identity crisis第38-40页
    4.3 Summary第40-41页
Chapter 5 Decolonization of the Spirit: Land-Based Language and HybridIdentity Reconstruction第41-51页
    5.1 A land-based language第41-45页
        5.1.1 The first dimension: Hogan, the writer第42-43页
        5.1.2 The second dimension: Horse, the Moses第43-45页
    5.2 Hybrid identity reconstruction第45-50页
        5.2.1 Critical mimicry of the western culture第46-49页
        5.2.2 Mutual influences between two cultures第49-50页
    5.3 Summary第50-51页
Chapter 6 Conclusion第51-53页
    6.1 Major findings第51页
    6.2 Limitations and implications for future studies第51-53页
Bibliography第53-55页

论文共55页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:元代东平作家杂剧研究
下一篇:《所罗门之歌》的“关系”哲学解读