| Abstract | 第5页 |
| 摘要 | 第6-8页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第8-12页 |
| 1.0 Background Information | 第8-10页 |
| 1.1 Significance of the Study | 第10-11页 |
| 1.2 Layout of the Study | 第11-12页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Review | 第12-30页 |
| 2.1 Theoretical Basis of Cloze | 第12-17页 |
| 2.1.1 Unitary Competence Hypothesis vs. Communicative Language Ability | 第12-14页 |
| 2.1.2 Gestalt Theory and Redundancy Theory | 第14-15页 |
| 2.1.3 Cohesion and Coherence in Text Linguistics | 第15-17页 |
| 2.2 Cloze as a Testing Technique | 第17-25页 |
| 2.2.1 Types of Cloze | 第18-20页 |
| 2.2.2 Suggested Principles of Cloze Tests | 第20-21页 |
| 2.2.3 Factors Affecting Scoring | 第21-25页 |
| 2.3 Relevant Studies about Cloze Test at home and abroad | 第25-30页 |
| 2.3.1 Relevant Studies from home and abroad | 第25-28页 |
| 2.3.2 The Relevant Studies of Deletion Methods in Cloze | 第28-30页 |
| Chapter Three Research Methodology | 第30-34页 |
| 3.1 Research Questions and Experimental Design | 第30-31页 |
| 3.2 Subjects | 第31-32页 |
| 3.3 Instruments | 第32-33页 |
| 3.4 Procedures | 第33-34页 |
| Chapter Four Results and Discussion | 第34-59页 |
| 4.1 Comparing Simulation Tests with SHMET | 第34-49页 |
| 4.1.1 Performance of cohesion and coherence | 第34-39页 |
| 4.1.2 Ratio of functional words to content words | 第39-41页 |
| 4.1.3 Performance of Content Validity | 第41-49页 |
| 4.2 Testing Procedure and Post-test procedure | 第49-58页 |
| 4.3 Interview with the Senior High School Teachers | 第58-59页 |
| Chapter Five Conclusion | 第59-62页 |
| 5.1 The Implications of Deletion Methods on Cloze | 第59-61页 |
| 5.2 Limitation of the Study | 第61-62页 |
| Bibliography | 第62-66页 |
| Appendix | 第66-78页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第78页 |
