| 摘要 | 第5-6页 |
| ABSTRACT | 第6-8页 |
| LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS | 第15-16页 |
| INTRODUCTION | 第16-19页 |
| PART I Theoretical Debate On Development And Features Of The Chinese Model | 第19-85页 |
| 1 STATE INTERVENTION AND DEVELOPMENT | 第20-40页 |
| 1.1 REASONS FOR INTERVENTION | 第20-23页 |
| 1.2 ORTHODOX ECONOMICS VS. KEYNESIAN SCHOOL | 第23-27页 |
| 1.3 MARXIAN DEVELOPMENT APPROACH AND IMPORT SUBSTITUTION STRATEGIES | 第27-30页 |
| 1.4 WASHINGTON CONSENSUS, ITS FAILURE, AND POST-WASHINGTON CONSENSUS | 第30-36页 |
| 1.5 THE INTERNATIONAL DEBATE TODAY | 第36-38页 |
| 1.6 THEORY ON INEQUALITIES | 第38-39页 |
| 1.7 FINALREMARKS | 第39-40页 |
| 2 HOW CHINA DIFFERS FROM TRADITIONAL MODELS OFDEVELOPMENT | 第40-60页 |
| 2.1 RECENT ECONOMIC HISTORY OF CHINA | 第40-46页 |
| 2.2 FEATURES OF THE CHINESE MODEL | 第46-52页 |
| 2.3 CHINA TODAY: BETWEEN INEQUALITIES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH | 第52-59页 |
| 2.4 FINALREMARKS | 第59-60页 |
| 3 TERRITORIAL UNBALANCES IN CHINA | 第60-85页 |
| 3.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS: ASSESSMENT OF TERRITORIAL UNBALANCES IN CHINA | 第60-62页 |
| 3.2 DESCRIPTION OF DATASETS | 第62-63页 |
| 3.3 INDEX OF PERFORMANCE AT NATIONAL LEVEL | 第63-67页 |
| 3.4 INDEX OF PERFORMANCE AT PROVINCIAL LEVEL | 第67-68页 |
| 3.5 GINI’S INDEX OF HETEROGENEITY | 第68-70页 |
| 3.6 GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF PERFORMANCES | 第70-80页 |
| 3.7 INDICES OF SIMILARITY AMONG PROVINCES | 第80-82页 |
| 3.8 FINAL REMARKS | 第82-85页 |
| PART II Industrialization And Unbalances In China: The Case Of Guangdong Province | 第85-162页 |
| 4 DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND POLICIES IN GUANGDONG | 第86-120页 |
| 4.1 INTRODUCTION | 第86-91页 |
| 4.2 ECONOMIC FACTS | 第91-99页 |
| 4.3 OPENING TO THE WORLD: POLICY TOOLS | 第99-103页 |
| 4.3.1 Special Economic Zones | 第99-101页 |
| 4.3.2 Development Zones | 第101-103页 |
| 4.4 PEARL RIVER DELTA AS ENGINE FOR DEVELOPMENT | 第103-107页 |
| 4.5 THE SPECIALIZED TOWNS PROGRAMME | 第107-116页 |
| 4.6 NEW POLICY PATHS: REDUCTION OF REGIONAL DISPARITIES | 第116-118页 |
| 4.7 FINALREMARKS | 第118-120页 |
| 5 INDUSTRIALIZATION AND TERRITORIAL UNBALANCES IN GUANGDONG: AN EXPLORATIVE ANALYSIS | 第120-146页 |
| 5.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS: ASSESSMENT OF DUALISM IN THE INDUSTRIALIZATIONPROCESS | 第120-124页 |
| 5.2 DESCRIPTION OF DATASET | 第124页 |
| 5.3 METHODOLOGY | 第124-134页 |
| 5.3.1 Indicators of Performance and Indicators of Policy Intervention | 第124-131页 |
| 5.3.2 Classification of Counties and Districts on the basis of the Indices | 第131-132页 |
| 5.3.3 Stochastic Dominance Test | 第132页 |
| 5.3.4 Heterogeneity Test | 第132-134页 |
| 5.3.5 Indices for Relative Performance and Policy and Comparative HomogeneityIndices | 第134页 |
| 5.4 RESULTS | 第134-141页 |
| 5.4.1 Phase 1: PRD vs. non-PRD | 第134-135页 |
| 5.4.2 Phase 2: Seven Groups | 第135-141页 |
| 5.5 COMMENTS ON THE RESULTS | 第141-144页 |
| 5.6 FINAL REMARKS | 第144-146页 |
| 6 DEVELOPMENT ANDINDUSTRIALIZATION: A TOWN-LEVEL ANALYSISIN DONGGUAN | 第146-156页 |
| 6.1 OVERVIEW OF THE TERRITORY | 第146-150页 |
| 6.2 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE REGION | 第150-155页 |
| 6.2.1 FDIs and Exports | 第150-152页 |
| 6.2.2 Specialized Towns | 第152-154页 |
| 6.2.3 Side effects in Dongguan’s industrialization process | 第154-155页 |
| 6.3 FINAL REMARKS | 第155-156页 |
| 7 CASE STUDY: DONGGUAN AS A MODEL OF DEVELOPMENT | 第156-162页 |
| 7.1 OBJECTIVE: ASSESSMENT OF INEQUALITIES | 第156-159页 |
| 7.2 DESCRIPTION OF DATASET | 第159页 |
| 7.3 METHODOLOGY | 第159-160页 |
| 7.4 RESULTS | 第160页 |
| 7.5 FINAL REMARKS | 第160-162页 |
| CONCLUDING REMARKS | 第162-166页 |
| APPENDIX: GUANGDONG ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION AT COUNTY-DISTRICT LEVEL | 第166-170页 |
| REFERENCES | 第170-188页 |
| 攻读博士学位期间取得的研究成果 | 第188-189页 |
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 第189-190页 |
| 附件 | 第190页 |
