摘要 | 第1-4页 |
Abstract | 第4-7页 |
1 Introduction | 第7-12页 |
·V.S.Naipaul and His Works | 第7-8页 |
·Summary About A House for Mr Biswas | 第8-9页 |
·Literature Review | 第9-12页 |
·The Aim of the Paper | 第9-10页 |
·The Significance of the Paper | 第10页 |
·The Present Situation of the Research | 第10-12页 |
2 Theory Overview | 第12-14页 |
·Classical Narratological Theory and Post Classical Narratological Theory | 第12-13页 |
·Roland Barthes' Theory | 第13-14页 |
3 The Narrative Features Shown in the Novel's Style | 第14-18页 |
·The Sense of Distance Shown in Naipaul's Style | 第14-15页 |
·Intertextuality | 第15-16页 |
·Rootlessness | 第16-18页 |
4 The Analysis of Naipaul's Unique Narrative Technique in A House for Mr Biswas on theNarrative Level | 第18-32页 |
·Under the Double Points of View,the Interlace and Artistic Power of the Two Story Layers | 第18-22页 |
·The Fundamental Definitions | 第18-19页 |
·The Analysis of the Two Points of View on the Two Layers in the Novel | 第19-22页 |
·The Relationship Among the Narrator, the Author and the Readers | 第22-24页 |
·James Phelan's Theory | 第22-23页 |
·The Relation Among the Narrator, the Author and Readers in the Novel | 第23-24页 |
·The Thoughts of the Two Narrators | 第24-26页 |
·M.H.Abrams' theory | 第24-25页 |
·Mr Biswas' "Tone" and Naipaul's " True Voice" | 第25-26页 |
·The Art of Blankness in the Narration | 第26-32页 |
·The Theory of Roman Ingarden | 第27页 |
·The Art of Blankness in the Novel | 第27-32页 |
5 The Analysis of the Fundamental Narrative Unit and Their Relationships on theFunctional Level | 第32-36页 |
·Roland Barthes' Theory about Function | 第32-33页 |
·The Cardinal Functions and the Catalytic Functions in the Novel | 第33-36页 |
6 The Analysis of the Classification of the Characters on the Action Level | 第36-41页 |
·A.J.Greimas' Theory About "Actantial Model" | 第36-37页 |
·The Classification of Characters in the Novel | 第37-41页 |
Conclusion | 第41-43页 |
Notes | 第43-45页 |
Bibliography | 第45-48页 |
Publications during M.A.Study | 第48-49页 |
Acknowledgements | 第49-50页 |