| Abstract | 第3页 |
| 摘要 | 第5-9页 |
| Chapter 1 Introduction | 第9-15页 |
| Section 1 Significance of the research | 第11-12页 |
| Section 2 Literature reviews | 第12-13页 |
| Section 3 Methodology | 第13-14页 |
| Section 4 Research Questions | 第14-15页 |
| Chapter 2 The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign ArbitralAward in Cambodia | 第15-29页 |
| Section 1 Current legal framework of the recognition andenforcement | 第15-19页 |
| 1. Law on Approval and Implementation of the convention on therecognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards (2001) | 第15-16页 |
| 2. Cambodia’s Commercial Arbitration Law (2006) | 第16-17页 |
| 3. Civil Procedure Code of Cambodia (2006) | 第17-19页 |
| Section 2 Procedure of Recognition and Enforcement offoreign arbitral award in Cambodia | 第19-21页 |
| 1. Form of Application | 第19页 |
| 2. Jurisdiction | 第19-21页 |
| a) Appeal Court | 第19-20页 |
| b) Supreme Court | 第20-21页 |
| Section 3 Grounds for refusal to the foreign arbitral award | 第21-29页 |
| 1. Ground which must be raised by the party resisting therecognition and enforcement | 第22-25页 |
| a) Incapacity or Invalid Arbitration Agreement | 第22-23页 |
| b) Inappropriate notice on the appointment of arbitrators or theproceeding of arbitration; fail to present their own case | 第23-24页 |
| c) The Award deals with a difference not contemplated by or notfalling within the terms of the submission to arbitration | 第24页 |
| d) Composition of Tribunal not in accordance with ArbitrationAgreement | 第24-25页 |
| e) Award not binding, suspended or set aside | 第25页 |
| 2. Grounds which can be raised by the courts | 第25-29页 |
| a) Arbitral matter cannot settle under Cambodia’s law | 第26-27页 |
| b) Public Policy | 第27-29页 |
| Chapter 3 Challenges facing by commercial arbitration inCambodia | 第29-56页 |
| Section 1 Challenges facing by law to refuse to enforceforeign arbitral award | 第29-50页 |
| 1. Two level of courts for refusal on foreign arbitral award | 第30-34页 |
| 2. Conflict between Law on Approval and Implementation of the convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitralaward (2001) and Civil Procedure Code of Cambodia (2006) | 第34-39页 |
| 3. Refusal to enforce arbitration award on the ground of non-arbitral matter | 第39-42页 |
| 4. Refusal to enforce the arbitral award on the ground of publicpolicy | 第42-50页 |
| a) ED&F Man (Hong Kong) v. China Sugar & Wine GroupCorporation (2003) | 第44-45页 |
| b) GRD Minproc Co., Ltd (Australia) v. Shanghai FeilunIndustrial Corporation (2008) | 第45-47页 |
| c) Shinetsu Chemical Industry Co., Ltd (Japan) v. Tianda TiancaiCo., Ltd. (2008) | 第47-48页 |
| d) Hemofarm DD, MAG International Trade Holding DD, Suram Media Ltd. v. Jinan Yongning Pharmaceutreal Co., Ltd. (2008) | 第48-50页 |
| Section 2 Corruption and lack of independence of the court | 第50-53页 |
| Section 3 Incompetent of Judge, Lawyer and Law Student onCommercial Arbitration | 第53-56页 |
| Chapter 4 Solution on issues facing by Commercial Arbitrationin Cambodia | 第56-61页 |
| Section 1 Solution to the issue of law | 第57-58页 |
| Section 2 Solution to the corruption of the court | 第58-60页 |
| Section 3 Solution to the incompetent of judge, lawyer andrelevant person | 第60-61页 |
| Chapter 5 Conclusion and Recommendation | 第61-65页 |
| Section 1 Conclusion | 第61-62页 |
| Section 2 Recommendation | 第62-65页 |
| Bibliography | 第65-72页 |
| Acknowledgement | 第72-73页 |
