| 摘要 | 第6-7页 |
| Abstract | 第7页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第10-18页 |
| 1.1 Research Background | 第10-14页 |
| 1.2 Significance and Objective of the Research | 第14-16页 |
| 1.3 General Organization of the Thesis | 第16-18页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Review and Theoretical Framework | 第18-37页 |
| 2.1 Literature Review | 第18-24页 |
| 2.1.1 An Introduction to The Ancestor Game | 第18-20页 |
| 2.1.2 Researches abroad on The Ancestor Game | 第20-22页 |
| 2.1.3 Domestic Researches on The Ancestor Game | 第22-24页 |
| 2.2 Theoretical Framework: Jacques Lacan's Mirror Theory | 第24-36页 |
| 2.2.1 Lacanian Theory in Literary Analysis | 第25-26页 |
| 2.2.2 The Mirror Image | 第26-28页 |
| 2.2.3 Mirror Stage | 第28-32页 |
| 2.2.4 Three Orders | 第32-33页 |
| 2.2.5 The Connection between Oedipus Complex and the Mirror Theory | 第33-36页 |
| 2.3 Summary of the Chapter | 第36-37页 |
| Chapter Three A Lacanian Reading of The Ancestor Game | 第37-54页 |
| 3.1 The Mirror Image of Identity | 第37-46页 |
| 3.1.1 Lang Tzu' Dimorphic State | 第38-41页 |
| 3.1.2 Steven Muir's Failure in Forming an Ideal Ego | 第41-42页 |
| 3.1.3 August Spiess' Blurry Image | 第42-46页 |
| 3.2 The Mirror Image of Space and Time | 第46-47页 |
| 3.3 The Mirror of Culture and Living Conditions | 第47-49页 |
| 3.4 The Third Space:Boundary of the Mirror | 第49-54页 |
| 3.4.1 Subject and Ideal Ego | 第51-52页 |
| 3.4.2 The Specter of the Other in the Subject | 第52-54页 |
| Chapter Four Conclusion | 第54-57页 |
| 4.1 General Conclusion | 第54-55页 |
| 4.2 Limitations of the Study | 第55-56页 |
| 4.3 Suggestions for Further Research | 第56-57页 |
| Bibliography | 第57-61页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第61页 |
