| ABSTRACT | 第1-12页 |
| CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION | 第12-28页 |
| ·Background of the study | 第12-18页 |
| ·Literature review | 第18-23页 |
| ·Significance of the research | 第23-25页 |
| ·Research hypotheses | 第25页 |
| ·Methodology | 第25-26页 |
| ·Outline of the dissertation | 第26-28页 |
| CHAPTER 2 THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL REGIME FOR OIL POLLUTIONCAUSED BY SHIPS | 第28-45页 |
| ·Introduction | 第28-29页 |
| ·Measures to prevent ship source oil pollution | 第29-34页 |
| ·Internationally applicable preventive measures | 第29-32页 |
| ·Preparedness, response and co-operation | 第32-33页 |
| ·Crossing points between prevention and compensation | 第33-34页 |
| ·Compensation for oil pollution from ships | 第34-41页 |
| ·Background of claims for oil pollution damage | 第35-36页 |
| ·Application of the law of tort in claims for oil pollution damage | 第36-38页 |
| ·Current legal framework for claims for oil pollution damage | 第38-39页 |
| ·Basis of liability for oil pollution damage | 第39-40页 |
| ·Responsible party in oil pollution liability conventions | 第40-41页 |
| ·Remedies for civil liability for oil pollution damage | 第41-43页 |
| ·Compensatory damages | 第41页 |
| ·Restitutio in integrum and the limitation of liability | 第41-42页 |
| ·Punitive damages | 第42-43页 |
| ·Concluding remarks | 第43-45页 |
| CHAPTER 3 VIEW OF CLC REGIME FOR OIL POLLUTION DAMAGE CAUSED BYSHIPS | 第45-79页 |
| ·Background of CLC regime | 第45-53页 |
| ·The Torrey Canyon Incident | 第45-47页 |
| ·1969 CLC and 1971 Fund Convention | 第47-49页 |
| ·1992 CLC Protocol and 1992 Fund Convention | 第49-52页 |
| ·2003 Supplementary Fund Protocol | 第52-53页 |
| ·Jurisdiction and Scope of Application of the 1992 CLC Protocol | 第53-63页 |
| ·Jurisdiction to entertain claims | 第53-55页 |
| ·Geographical scope | 第55页 |
| ·Compensable damage | 第55-58页 |
| ·IOPC Funds Perspective | 第58-63页 |
| ·Liability and Limitations | 第63-71页 |
| ·Persons liable for oil pollution damage | 第63-67页 |
| ·Strict liability for oil pollution damage | 第67-68页 |
| ·Limitation of liability | 第68-71页 |
| ·Compulsory Insurance and Direct Action | 第71-75页 |
| ·Compulsory insurance | 第71-73页 |
| ·Direct action against insurer | 第73-74页 |
| ·Rights of insurer upon direct action | 第74-75页 |
| ·Concluding remarks | 第75-79页 |
| CHAPTER 4 ASSESSMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CLC IN THE LIGHT OFJUDICIAL DECISIONS AND DOMESTIC LAWS | 第79-115页 |
| ·Introduction | 第79页 |
| ·Assessment of implementation of CLC in the Erika Incident | 第79-89页 |
| ·Facts of the incident | 第79-80页 |
| ·Judicial decision of the Court of First Instance | 第80-82页 |
| ·Judicial decision of the Court of Appeal | 第82-84页 |
| ·Judgement of the Court of Cassation | 第84页 |
| ·Views on the implications of the case | 第84-89页 |
| ·Assessment of implementation of CLC in the Braer Incident | 第89-96页 |
| ·Facts of the incident | 第89-90页 |
| ·Claims and issues arising | 第90-92页 |
| ·Whether proper to apply principle of remoteness of damage | 第92-93页 |
| ·Status of IOPC Funds criteria and decisions | 第93-94页 |
| ·Judicial decision of the Court of Session's Inner House | 第94页 |
| ·Views on the implications of the case | 第94-96页 |
| ·Assessment of implementation of CLC in Tanzania | 第96-102页 |
| ·Tanzania and ship-source oil spill | 第96页 |
| ·Implementation of liability and compensation regime | 第96-100页 |
| ·Views on the implications of the law | 第100-102页 |
| ·Assessment of implementation of CLC in China | 第102-110页 |
| ·Oil pollution potentials | 第102-103页 |
| ·Application of liability and compensation law | 第103-108页 |
| ·Views on the implications of the law | 第108-110页 |
| ·Concluding Remarks | 第110-115页 |
| CHAPTER 5 ASSESSMENT OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLC REGIME ANDOTHER LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION REGIMES | 第115-142页 |
| ·Introduction | 第115页 |
| ·United States' regime for oil pollution | 第115-126页 |
| ·The Exxon Valdez incident | 第116-117页 |
| ·Liability for oil pollution from ships | 第117-118页 |
| ·Covered costs and damages | 第118-120页 |
| ·Defences available for Responsible party | 第120-121页 |
| ·Limits on liability | 第121-122页 |
| ·Evidence of financial responsibility | 第122-123页 |
| ·Right of claim against guarantor | 第123页 |
| ·Fund for oil pollution liability | 第123-124页 |
| ·OPA 1990 and the implementation of CLC regime | 第124-126页 |
| ·European Union Environmental Liability | 第126-133页 |
| ·EU environmental liability directive | 第127-128页 |
| ·Scope of application of the ELD | 第128页 |
| ·Liability for environmental damage | 第128-129页 |
| ·Financial Security | 第129页 |
| ·Implementation of ELD | 第129-130页 |
| ·Directive on waste | 第130-132页 |
| ·EU laws and the implementation of CLC regime | 第132-133页 |
| ·Liability for bunker oil pollution damage | 第133-139页 |
| ·Jurisdiction and scope of application | 第134-135页 |
| ·Liability for bunker oil pollution | 第135-136页 |
| ·Insurance or financial security | 第136-138页 |
| ·Limitation of liability | 第138页 |
| ·2001 Bunker Convention and the implementation of CLC regime | 第138-139页 |
| ·Concluding remarks | 第139-142页 |
| CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION | 第142-148页 |
| ·Final Remarks | 第142-145页 |
| ·Recommendations | 第145-146页 |
| ·Further research | 第146-148页 |
| Bibliography | 第148-157页 |
| Publications | 第157-158页 |
| Acknowledgement | 第158-160页 |
| 作者简介 | 第160页 |
