| 摘要 | 第6-8页 |
| Abstract | 第8-9页 |
| Contents | 第10-12页 |
| Chapter 1 Introduction | 第12-19页 |
| 1.1 Research Background | 第12-15页 |
| 1.2 Objectives and Methodology of the Study | 第15-16页 |
| 1.3 Significance of the Study | 第16-17页 |
| 1.4 Thesis Structure | 第17-19页 |
| Chapter 2 Theoretical Background:Philosophical Hermeneutics | 第19-30页 |
| 2.1 Origin and History of Hermeneutics | 第19-23页 |
| 2.2 Some Basic Terms in Philosophical Hermeneutics | 第23-27页 |
| 2.2.1 Fore-understanding and Prejudice | 第23-24页 |
| 2.2.2 Effective History | 第24页 |
| 2.2.3 Fusion of Horizons | 第24-25页 |
| 2.2.4 Hermeneutic Process of Translation | 第25-27页 |
| 2.3 Significance of Philosophical Hermeneutics in Translation | 第27-30页 |
| 2.3.1 Historicity of Understanding and the Active Role of the Translator | 第27页 |
| 2.3.2 Effective History and Possibilities of Re-translation | 第27-28页 |
| 2.3.3 Historicity of Understanding and Relativity of Translation Standards | 第28-30页 |
| Chapter 3 The Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi:A Religious Interpretation of Dao De Jing | 第30-38页 |
| 3.1 Brief Introduction to Laozi and Dao De Jing | 第30-32页 |
| 3.1.1 Laozi | 第30-31页 |
| 3.1.2 Dao De Jing | 第31-32页 |
| 3.2 The Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi and Its Daoist Origin | 第32-34页 |
| 3.2.1 The Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第32-33页 |
| 3.2.2 Chinese Daoism | 第33-34页 |
| 3.3 The Author of the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi and Its Writing Situation | 第34-36页 |
| 3.3.1 Authorship of the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第34-35页 |
| 3.3.2 Writing Situation | 第35-36页 |
| 3.4 Relationship between the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi and Daoism | 第36-38页 |
| Chapter 4 Stephen Bokenkamp's Translation of the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第38-78页 |
| 4.1 Laozi's "Dao" and "Dao" in the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi and Bokenkamp's Interpretation | 第38-57页 |
| 4.1.1 "Dao" in Dao De Jing | 第38-41页 |
| 4.1.2 Personification of "Dao" in the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第41-46页 |
| 4.1.3 Bokenkamp's Interpretation of The Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第46-57页 |
| 4.2 'Distortion of Dao De Jing in the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi and Bokenkamp's Interpretation | 第57-65页 |
| 4.2.1 Deletions in the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第58-61页 |
| 4.2.2 Additions in the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第61-63页 |
| 4.2.3 Substitutions in the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第63-65页 |
| 4.3 Other Key Terms of Daoism in the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi and Bokenkamp's Interpretation | 第65-75页 |
| 4.3.1 Gushen(谷神) | 第65-67页 |
| 4.3.2 Taiping(太平) | 第67-68页 |
| 4.3.3 Changsheng(长生) | 第68-69页 |
| 4.3.4 Jing(精) | 第69-75页 |
| 4.4 Strategies and Significance of Bokenkamp's Translation in the West | 第75-78页 |
| 4.4.1 Bokenkamp's Translation Strategies | 第75-76页 |
| 4.4.2 Significance and Influence of Bokenkamp's Translation of the Xiang'er Commentary to Laozi | 第76-78页 |
| Chapter 5 Conclusion | 第78-81页 |
| 5.1 Major Findings of the Study | 第78-79页 |
| 5.2 Weakness and Limitations of the Study | 第79页 |
| 5.3 Suggestions for Future Research | 第79-81页 |
| Bibliography | 第81-86页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第86-87页 |
| Appendix The Omitted "Dao" in Detail | 第87-90页 |
| Published Paper While Registered with the MA Program | 第90页 |
